• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Robotic-guided cosmetic treatments more accurate than man

    Although few studies have been performed on laser beam irradiation in contrast to studies on laser beam emission, such as for selective photothermolysis and fractional photothermolysis, irradiation accuracy and consistency is very important.

    A recent study comparing the improvements in the evenness of laser irradiation using a robot versus manual irradiation, found the robot-guided treatment to be much more accurate than the human hand achieving superior outcomes. These pioneering results could lead to a potential future standard in high precision energy-based medical/aesthetic treatments with the use of robotics.

    “In this new chapter of laser medicine and surgery opened by this study, the intrinsic limitations of human hands in accuracy and consistency would be overcome, and accurate and consistent irradiation would be made possible. In my opinion, I believe that robotics are very much part of the future in cosmetic treatments and that they will be indispensible for laser medicine and surgery,” said Yongsoo Lee, M.D., co-CEO and co-founder, Oh and Lee Medical Robot, Inc., in South Korea. Dr. Lee presented the results of this study at the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery meeting held in April. 

    Consistency and accuracy of laser irradiation

    Dr. Lee and colleagues conducted a study assessing the improvement in consistency and accuracy of laser irradiation treatments, which can be represented by the evenness of laser irradiation using a robot by statistical comparisons with manual irradiation.

    In the study, after irradiating 462 shots of laser (spot size 8 mm) in a 100 x 105 mm rectangular region of interest (ROI) divided into 100 fractions with an autonomous robot arm and a human subject at frequencies of 30 and 10 Hz, the area, distances between centers of laser beams, and the number of shots in each fraction were statistically compared after 10 trials with each subject at each frequency. The robot was programmed to irradiate with an overlap of 25.96% of the area of the previous shots, and the human subject (dermatologist with over 10 years laser experience) was asked to overlap 20-30% of the area.

    The investigators found the robot-guided treatments to be superior to the manually guided treatments. Results showed that robotic irradiation demonstrated consistency in distances between beams and distribution in fractions at both 30 and 10 Hz frequencies, and was significantly superior than manual irradiation in the ratio of area covered by beams to ROI, distances between beams, and distribution in fractions at each frequency.

    “As an aesthetic dermatologist myself, I can appreciate that virtually all doctors would welcome the robot-guided treatments, as valuable time can be saved in the busy practice. That saved time can then be invested in other patients and procedures, allowing physicians to see more patients per day. Moreover, due to the heightened precision of robotic-guided treatments, cosmetic treatments are much safer with a significantly reduced chance of adverse events occurring such as burns and spotty hypopigmentation,” Dr. Lee said.

    Next: Discrepancies in evenness of robotic vs manual irradiation

    0 Comments

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available
    Derm Pulse
    Article image

    Brought to you by:

    Solodyn

    Latest Tweets Follow