Register / Log In

Researchers plan clinical trial targeting chronic inflammation from Lyme disease



College Station, Texas — Chronic inflammation following Lyme disease may respond to therapy that targets inflammation custom-designed peptides, according to a team of investigators. The team has submitted a pre-Investigative New Drug (pIND) letter to the Food and Drug Administration as a step toward testing whether a novel treatment based on this model is effective.

Pending eventual approval to proceed, the team will submit a formal Investigational New Drug (IND) application. Upon approval of the IND, the team can begin clinical trials.

"As dermatologists know, a bull's eye rash following the bite of an infected tick is a defining marker for Lyme disease," says principal investigator M. Karen Newell-Rogers, Ph.D. Dr. Newell-Rogers is the Raleigh R. White Jr., Endowed Professor of Surgical Research at Scott and White Hospital of Texas Agricultural and Mechanical Health Science Center, College Station.

Inflammation action

Lyme disease is transmitted by ticks infected with Borrelia burgdorferi. For many patients, treatment with antibiotic therapy resolves the disease, particularly when the infection is diagnosed early.

Some patients, however, develop persistent symptoms, including joint inflammation, fatigue, and, occasionally, cognitive changes. One school of thought holds that infection persists, and that long-term antibiotics will eventually resolve the infection. Another school holds that some patients are genetically susceptible to a post-infectious chronic inflammatory process that persists even where there is no overt sign of the infection.

"Our model is that there is a genetic element in determining response to infection and whether one develops chronic inflammatory symptoms," Dr. Newell-Rogers says. "We think that whether the organism is there is important, but just as important is the nature of the immune response that a person's immune system mounts in playing a role in the aftermath."

Toward that end, she and her investigative team have developed an investigational therapy, VGV-L, which is based on substituting a targeted peptide for the patient's own proinflammatory peptides. They want to know whether using the targeted peptide can dampen chronic inflammation and redirect the immune system. "If our peptide technology proves itself, we hope to diminish chronic inflammation following Lyme disease by targeting the immunogenetic response with a custom-targeted peptide therapy," Dr. Newell-Rogers says.


A randomized, split-face, controlled study has shown that photodynamic treatment using hexyl aminolevulinate HCl (HAL; Allumera, Photocure) and multiple laser and light sources is safe, well tolerated and effective for photorejuvenation, says Sabrina Fabi, M.D.

According to the National Cancer Institute, skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States, and its prevalence keeps growing. And despite an abundance of initiatives designed to increase sun protection and early detection, people don't seem to be acting on what they know.

The estate of a deceased patient has sued Dr. Mole for not making a melanoma diagnosis earlier. The plaintiff's attorney has offered a settlement agreement for $1 million. He is concerned about the settlement being listed in the National Data Practitioner Data Bank. His attorney assures Dr. Mole that as this late point in his career this will do little to no impact on his reputation.

The medical world is changing; this is fact. Exactly how these changes will translate into practice and affect dermatology is unclear. So unclear, in fact, that many are scrambling to address issues that may or may not be relevant as the model for healthcare delivery is debated on national, state and local levels. This leaves dermatology at the apex of a trisection between science, art and policy that warrants further inquiry.

Motivation, opportunity and rationalization. This may sound like the title of a new James Bond film, but in reality, it's the triad of factors that provides fertile ground for the internal fraud that is an all-too-common occurrence in dermatologists' offices. A recent survey by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) revealed that 82.8 percent of managers had worked in a practice that experienced embezzlement.